Thermoplastic composition, method of producing the same, and articles made therefrom

ABSTRACT

A thermoplastic composition comprising the melt blending product of one or more thermoplastic polymers; and from 2 to 20 PHR, of one or more gloss reducing additives wherein each gloss reducing additive comprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer having a glass transition temperature of greater than or equal to 40° C. and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or more crosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents having two or more ethylenically unsaturated radicals capable of free-radical polymerization, wherein a test specimen produced from the thermoplastic composition has roughness according to DIN 4768 of Ra greater than or equal to 0.6 microns, Rz greater than or equal to 6 microns, Rmax greater than or equal to 7 microns, and a gloss less than 65, 75 degree angle, is provided. Methods for producing the thermoplastic compositions, methods for producing articles from the thermoplastic compositions and such articles are also provided.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.13/270,040, filed Oct. 10, 2011; which claim the benefit of U.S.Provisional Application No. 61/408,203 filed Oct. 23, 2010, the entirecontents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The instant invention relates to a thermoplastic composition, method ofproducing the same, and articles made therefrom.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many applications of thermoplastic materials require a low glosssurface, including for example, thermoplastic panels with a wood-likeappearance. Current approaches used to lower plastic surface glossinclude the use of 5 to 15 wt % of 1 to 10 micron sized inorganicfillers and/or crosslinked polymeric particles plastic additives basedon the total weight of the plastic formulation (i.e., base plastic orpolymer plus all additives). Such inorganic and polymeric particlesgenerally lower surface gloss by extending from the plastic surfaceproviding a rough surface which destructively scatters light therebydecreasing gloss. Such additives, however, tend to significantly reducethe impact resistance of the plastic to which they are added. Inaddition, such additives generally make the final plastic formulationopaque.

Another issue with such known additives is the inability to maintain lowgloss. Specifically, such particulate additives tend to be covered bythe plastic material upon exposure to heat as the matrix polymer tendsto flow around and over the particulate additives when heated afterinitial processing. For example, during thermal forming (orthermoforming), gloss will increase significantly for plastics withparticulate additives. The particulate additive approach to decreasingthe gloss of plastic surfaces is further subject to burnishing. Burnishresistance is the term used to describe resistance to gloss increase byrubbing. That is, the portion of the particulates which extend out fromthe plastic surface may be removed or broken off with rubbing of theplastic surface thereby leading to a smoother surface and increasedgloss. A plastic formulation with low surface gloss, good impactresistance, good burnish resistance and which may be heat treated postinitial processing without a substantial increase in gloss would be verydesirable. Moreover, it would be desirable to have a plastic formulationin which the gloss reduction additive is compatible with thethermoplastic polymer matrix so as to provide a uniform sheet in meltprocessing, and specifically which is compatible with polymethylmethacrylate (“PMMA”), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer (“ABS”),poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (“SAN”), polyvinylchloride (“PVC”),acrylonitrile/styrene acrylate (“ASA”), chlorinated polyvinylchloride(“CPVC”), polylactic acid (“PLA”), polycarbonate (“PC”), polyesters,such as poly(ethylene terephthalate) (“PET”), poly(butyleneterephthalate) (“PBT”), and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (“PETG”).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention is a thermoplastic composition, method of producing thesame, articles made therefrom, and methods for making such articles.

One embodiment of the invention provides a thermoplastic compositioncomprising the melt blending product of: a first component comprisingone or more thermoplastic polymers; and from 2 to 20 parts by weight perhundred parts by weight of the first component (PHR) of a secondcomponent comprising one or more gloss reducing additive copolymerswherein each gloss reducing additive copolymer comprises a(meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more (meth)acrylatemonomers and from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM (parts by weight per hundred partsby weight of the total weight of the one or more (meth)acrylatemonomers) derived from one or more crosslinking monomers and/orgraft-linking agents; wherein each gloss reducing additive copolymer hasa glass transition temperature (Tg) of greater than or equal to 40° C.and wherein a test specimen produced from the thermoplastic composition(that is 2 inches wide and 40 mils thick produced by extrusion through afilm die) has a roughness according to DIN 4768 of Ra greater than orequal to 0.6 microns, Rz greater than or equal to 6 microns and Rmaxgreater than or equal to 7 microns, and a gloss less than 65, 75 degreeangle.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a compositioncomprising the melt blending product of: a first component comprisingone or more thermoplastic polymers; and from 2 to 20 PHR of a secondcomponent comprising one or more gloss reducing additive copolymerswherein each gloss reducing additive copolymer comprises a(meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more (meth)acrylatemonomers and from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM units derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein each glossreducing additive copolymer has a Tg of greater than or equal to 40° C.and wherein a test specimen produced from the thermoplastic composition(that is 2 inches wide and 40 mils thick produced by extrusion through afilm die) has a gloss less than 65, 75 degree angle.

In an alternative embodiment, the gloss reducing additives of the secondcomponent further comprise one or more copolymers selected from thegroup consisting of styrenic polymers comprising one or more styrenicmonomer units and (meth)acrylate/styrenic copolymers comprising one ormore (meth)acrylate monomer units and one or more styrenic monomerunits, wherein the styrenic monomer units are selected from the groupconsisting of styrene monomers, acrylonitrile monomers, and combinationsthereof.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a thermoplasticcomposition comprising the melt blending product of: a first componentcomprising one or more thermoplastic polymers; and a second componentcomprising one or more core/shell polymers wherein said one or morecore/shell polymers comprise a crosslinked core comprising from 0.001 to0.04 PHM derived from one or more crosslinking monomers and/orgraft-linking agents and one or more (meth)acrylate monomers polymerizedto give a copolymer having a glass transition temperature of greaterthan or equal to 10° C., and one or more thermoplastic shells having aTg of equal to or greater than 60° C. wherein the shell optionallycontains from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM units derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents, wherein the totalamount of the one or more shells comprises 5 to 50 wt % of the totalweight of the one or more core/shell polymers.

In another embodiment of the invention, the one or more (meth)acrylatecopolymers comprise one or more monomers selected from the groupconsisting of C₁-C₁₈ (meth)acrylate monomer units and combinationsthereof, wherein the one or more styrenic copolymers comprise one ormore monomers selected from styrene monomers, acrylonitrile monomers,and combinations thereof, and wherein the one or more(meth)acrylate/styrenic copolymers comprise units derived from one ormore monomers selected from the group of C₁-C₁₈ (meth)acrylate monomerunits and combinations thereof and one or more monomers selected fromstyrene monomers, acrylonitrile monomers, and combinations thereof andoptionally comprise from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM of units derived from one ormore crosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents and combinationsthereof.

In another alternative embodiment of the invention, the second componenthas a polymer particle volume average size less than or equal to 350 nm.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the second component hasa polymer particle volume average size less from 70 to 250 nm.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the one or more(meth)acrylate copolymer of the one or more gloss reducing additivescomprise from 50 to 95 percent by weight units derived frommethylmethacrylate units and from 5 to 50 percent by weight unitsderived from ethylacrylate and/or butylacrylate units.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the one or more(meth)acrylate copolymers of the second component comprise from 65 to85% by weight of units derived from methylmethacrylate and from 35 to 15wt % units derived from ethylacrylate units and further wherein thegloss reducing additive comprises from 0.002 to 0.015 PHM of unitsderived from EDGMA.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the inventivethermoplastic composition has an impact value that is at least 90% ofthe impact value of the first component.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a method forproducing a thermoplastic composition comprising: selecting a firstcomponent comprising one or more thermoplastic polymers; selecting asecond component comprising one or more gloss reducing additivecopolymers wherein each gloss reducing additive copolymer comprises a(meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more (meth)acrylatemonomers from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from units of one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein each glossreducing additive copolymer has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C.; melt processing the second componentinto the first component wherein the second component is present in anamount of from 2 to 20 PHR; thereby producing the thermoplasticcomposition wherein a test specimen produced therefrom has roughnessaccording to DIN 4768 of Ra greater than or equal to 0.6 microns, Rzgreater than or equal to 6 microns and Rmax greater than or equal to 7microns.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a method forproducing a thermoplastic composition comprising: selecting a firstcomponent comprising one or more thermoplastic polymers; selecting asecond component comprising one or more gloss reducing additivecopolymers wherein each gloss reducing additive copolymer comprises a(meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more (meth)acrylatemonomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM (parts per hundred monomer based on theweight of the one or more (meth)acrylate monomers) of units derived fromone or more crosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; whereineach gloss reducing additive copolymer has a glass transitiontemperature of greater than or equal to 40° C.; melt processing thesecond component into the first component wherein the second componentis present in an amount of from 2 to 20 PHR; thereby producing thethermoplastic composition wherein a test specimen produced therefrom hasa gloss of less than 65 when measured at an angle of 75 degrees.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a method for formingan article comprising: selecting an inventive thermoplastic composition;and forming the thermoplastic composition into an article.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the forming thethermoplastic composition into the article is selected from injectionmolding, rotational molding, thermoforming, calendering, extrusion,compression molding, and blow molding.

Another alternative embodiment of the invention provides an articleformed from an inventive method.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the article made from aninventive thermoplastic composition and/or according to an inventivemethod has a gloss which is substantially independent of the shear rateduring the step of forming the thermoplastic composition into thearticle.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the one or morethermoplastic polymers of the first component are selected from thegroup consisting PMMA, poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile), acrylonitrilebutadiene styrene polymer, polyamides, polyacrylates, thermoplasticpolyesters, polyvinyl chloride, chlorinated polyvinyl chloride,polycarbonate, polylactic acid, polymethacrylate, acrylonitrile/styreneacrylate (ASA), polystyrene, blends thereof and combinations thereof.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, a test specimen producedfrom the thermoplastic composition has a gloss of less than or equal to65 at a 75 degree angle.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, a gloss of a testspecimen produced from the thermoplastic composition is not increased bymore than 10% following thermoforming of the test specimen.

In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the crosslinking and/orgraft-linking monomers are selected from the group consisting ofdivinylbenzene, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, ethylene glycoldimethacrylate, trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate, allyl methacrylate,diallyl phthalate, diallylacrylamide, triallyl(iso)cyanurate, triallyltrimelitate, (poly)alkylene glycol, 1,6-hexanediol di(meth)acrylate,(poly)ethylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, (poly)propylene glycoldi(meth)acrylate, (poly)tetramethylene glycol di(meth)acrylate,pentaerythritol tetra(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol tri(meth)acrylate,pentaerythritol di(meth)acrylate, dipentaerythritol hexa(meth)acrylate,dipentaerythritol penta(meth)acrylate, graft-linking monomers having twoor more non-conjugated double bonds of differing reactivity, such asallyl methacrylate, diallyl maleate and allyl acryloxypropionate, andcombinations thereof.

Another alternative embodiment of the invention provides a thermoplasticcomposition consisting essentially of the melt blending product of: afirst component comprising one or more thermoplastic polymers; and from2 to 20 PHR of a second component comprising one or more gloss reducingadditive copolymers wherein each gloss reducing additive copolymercomprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more(meth)acrylate monomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein each glossreducing additive copolymer has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C. and wherein a test specimen producedfrom the thermoplastic composition (that is 2 inches wide and 40 milsthick produced by extrusion through a film die) has a roughnessaccording to DIN 4768 of Ra greater than or equal to 0.6 microns, Rzgreater than or equal to 6 microns and Rmax greater than or equal to 7microns, and a gloss less than 65 at a 75 degree angle.

Yet another alternative embodiment of the invention provides athermoplastic composition comprising the melt blending product of: afirst component which consists essentially of one or more thermoplasticpolymers; and from 2 to 20 PHR of a second component comprising one ormore gloss reducing additive copolymers wherein each gloss reducingadditive copolymer comprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer derived from oneor more (meth)acrylate monomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from oneor more crosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein eachgloss reducing additive copolymer has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C. and wherein a test specimen producedfrom the thermoplastic composition (that is 2 inches wide and 40 milsthick produced by extrusion through a film die) has a roughnessaccording to DIN 4768 of Ra greater than or equal to 0.6 microns, Rzgreater than or equal to 6 microns and Rmax greater than or equal to 7microns, and a gloss less than 65 at a 75 degree angle.

Yet another alternative embodiment of the invention provides athermoplastic composition comprising the melt blending product of: afirst component comprising one or more thermoplastic polymers; and from2 to 20 PHR, based on 100 parts by weight of the first component, of asecond component which consists essentially of one or more glossreducing additive copolymers wherein each gloss reducing additivecopolymer comprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more(meth)acrylate monomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein each glossreducing additive copolymer has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C. and wherein a test specimen producedfrom the thermoplastic composition (that is 2 inches wide and 40 milsthick produced by extrusion through a film die) has a roughnessaccording to DIN 4768 of Ra greater than or equal to 0.6 microns, Rzgreater than or equal to 6 microns and Rmax greater than or equal to 7microns, and a gloss less than 65 @75 degree angle.

Yet another alternative embodiment of the invention provides acomposition consisting essentially of the melt blending product of: afirst component comprising one or more thermoplastic polymers; and from2 to 20 PHR of a second component comprising one or more gloss reducingadditive copolymers wherein each gloss reducing additive copolymercomprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more(meth)acrylate monomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein each glossreducing additive copolymer has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C. and wherein a test specimen producedfrom the thermoplastic composition (that is 2 inches wide and 40 milsthick produced by extrusion through a film die) has a gloss less than 65at a 75 degree angle.

Yet another alternative embodiment of the invention provides acomposition comprising the melt blending product of: a first componentwhich consists essentially of one or more thermoplastic polymers; andfrom 2 to 20 PHR of a second component comprising one or more glossreducing additive copolymers wherein each gloss reducing additivecopolymer comprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more(meth)acrylate monomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein each glossreducing additive copolymer has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C. and wherein a test specimen producedfrom the thermoplastic composition (that is 2 inches wide and 40 milsthick produced by extrusion through a film die) has a gloss less than 65at a 75 degree angle.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a compositioncomprising the melt blending product of: a first component comprisingone or more thermoplastic polymers; and from 2 to 20 PHR of a secondcomponent which consists essentially of one or more gloss reducingadditive copolymers wherein each gloss reducing additive copolymercomprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more(meth)acrylate monomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein each glossreducing additive copolymer has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C. and wherein a test specimen producedfrom the thermoplastic composition (that is 2 inches wide and 40 milsthick produced by extrusion through a film die) has a gloss less than 65at a 75 degree angle.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a thermoplasticcomposition consisting essentially of the melt blending product of: afirst component comprising one or more thermoplastic polymers; and asecond component comprising one or more core/shell polymers wherein saidone or more core/shell polymers comprise a crosslinked core comprisingfrom 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or more crosslinking monomersand/or graft-linking agents and one or more (meth)acrylate monomerspolymerized to give a copolymer having a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 10° C., and one or more thermoplastic shellshaving a Tg of equal to or greater than 60° C. wherein the shelloptionally contains 0.001 and 0.04 PHM derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents, wherein the totalamount of the one or more shells comprises 5 to 50 wt % of the totalweight of the one or more core/shell polymers.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a thermoplasticcomposition comprising the melt blending product of: a first componentwhich consists essentially of one or more thermoplastic polymers; and asecond component comprising one or more core/shell polymers wherein saidone or more core/shell polymers comprise a crosslinked core comprisingfrom 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or more crosslinking monomersand/or graft-linking agents and one or more (meth)acrylate monomerspolymerized to give a copolymer having a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 10° C., and one or more thermoplastic shellshaving a Tg of equal to or greater than 60° C. wherein the shelloptionally contains 0.001 and 0.04 PHM derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents, wherein the totalamount of the one or more shells comprises 5 to 50 wt % of the totalweight of the one or more core/shell polymers.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a method forproducing a thermoplastic composition consisting essentially of:selecting a first component comprising one or more thermoplasticpolymers; selecting a second component comprising one or more glossreducing additive copolymers wherein each gloss reducing additivecopolymer comprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more(meth)acrylate monomers and from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one ormore crosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein eachgloss reducing additive copolymer has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C.; melt processing the second componentinto the first component wherein the second component is present in anamount of from 2 to 20 PHR; thereby producing the thermoplasticcomposition wherein a test specimen produced therefrom has roughnessaccording to DIN 4768 in the range Ra greater than or equal to 0.6microns, Rz greater than or equal to 6 microns and Rmax greater than orequal to 7 microns.

An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a method forproducing a thermoplastic composition consisting essentially of:selecting a first component comprising one or more thermoplasticpolymers; selecting a second component comprising one or more glossreducing additive copolymers wherein each gloss reducing additivecopolymer comprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more(meth)acrylate monomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein each glossreducing additive copolymer has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C.; melt processing the second componentinto the first component wherein the second component is present in anamount of from 2 to 20 PHR; thereby producing the thermoplasticcomposition wherein a test specimen produced therefrom has a gloss ofless than 65, at 75 degree angle.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in thedrawings a form that is exemplary; it being understood, however, thatthis invention is not limited to the precise arrangements andinstrumentalities shown.

FIG. 1 is a graph of the gloss, as a function of amount of crosslinker,of the thermoplastic compositions of Inventive Examples 1-4 at a 60degree angle.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The instant invention provides a thermoplastic composition, method ofproducing the same, and articles made therefrom.

The invention provides a thermoplastic composition comprising the meltblending product of: a first component comprising one or morethermoplastic polymers; and from 2 to 20 parts by weight per 100 partsby weight of the first component (PHR), of a second component comprisingone or more gloss reducing additive copolymers wherein each glossreducing additive copolymer comprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer derivedfrom one or more (meth)acrylate monomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM (partsper hundred monomer based on the total weight of the one or more(meth)acrylate monomers) derived from one or more crosslinking monomersand/or graft-linking agents; wherein each gloss reducing additivecopolymer has a glass transition temperature of greater than or equal to40° C. and wherein a test specimen produced from the thermoplasticcomposition (that is 2 inches wide and 40 mils thick produced byextrusion through a film die) has a roughness according to DIN 4768 ofRa greater than or equal to 0.6 microns, Rz greater than or equal to 6microns and Rmax greater than or equal to 7 microns, and a gloss lessthan 65 at a 75 degree angle.

The thermoplastic composition according to the present inventioncomprises a first component of one or more thermoplastic polymers.Exemplary thermoplastic polymers useful in the first component include,but are not limited to, PMMA, SAN, ASA, ABS, polyamides, polyarylates,thermoplastic polyesters (such as, PET, PETG, and PBT), polyamides,polyacrylates, polyvinyl chloride, chlorinated polyvinylchloride,polycarbonate, polylactic acid, polystyrene, polymethacrylate, blendsthereof, and combinations thereof.

The thermoplastic composition comprises from 2 to 20 PHR of the secondcomponent, based on 100 parts of the first component. All individualvalues and subranges from 2 to 20 PHR are included herein and disclosedherein; for example, the PHR of the second component can be from a lowerlimit of 2, 3, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 or 19 PHR to an upper limit of 5, 7,10, 12, 14, 17, or 20 PHR. For example, the PHR of the second componentmay be in the range of from 2 to 20 PHR, or in the alternative, from 3to 9 PHR, or in the alternative, from 7 to 19 PHR.

In some embodiments of the thermoplastic composition, the one or moregloss reducing additives of the second component have a volume averagepolymer particle size from 70 to 350 nm. All individual values from 70to 350 nm are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, thepolymer particle size of the second component may have an upper limit of350, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, or 80 nm, and a lower limit of 70, 100,150, 200, 250, 300 or 340 nm. For example, the average polymer particlesize may be in the range of from 70 to 350 nm, or in the alternative,from 70 to 250 nm, or in the alternative, from 70 to 150 nm, or in thealternative, from 70 to 100 nm, or in the alternative, from 100 to 350nm, or in the alternative, from 150 to 350 nm, or in the alternative,from 100 to 250 nm, or in the alternative, from 300 to 350 nm.

The one or more gloss reducing additives comprise from 0.001 to 0.04 PHMunits derived from one or more crosslinking monomers and/orgraft-linking agents. As used here the term “one or more multifunctionalcross-linking monomers and/or graft-linking agents” means that one ormore cross-linking monomers may be present, one or more graft-linkingagents may be present or that one or more crosslinking monomers incombination with one or more graft-linking agent may be present. As usedherein the terms “crosslinking monomer” and “graft-linking agent” meanmonomeric units having two or more ethylenically unsaturated radicalscapable of free-radical polymerization, All individual values andsubranges from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM are included herein and disclosedherein; for example, an amount derived from the one or more crosslinkingmonomers and/or graft-linking agents may be present from a lower limitof 0.001, 0.003, 0.005, 0.006 or 0.009 PHM to an upper limit of 0.04,0.03, 0.02, 0.01, or 0.008 PHM. For example, the PHM of units derivedfrom the one or more crosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agentsmay be in the range of from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM, or in the alternative,from 0.003 to 0.03 PHM, or in the alternative, from 0.005 to 0.02 PHM.

A crosslinking monomer useful in the gloss reducing additives is amonomer that has two or more reactive groups that are capable ofparticipating in a polymerization reaction. Exemplary crosslinkingmonomers include, but are not limited, to divinylbenzene,trimethyolpropane triacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA),butylene glycol dimethacrylate (BGDMA), trimethyolpropanetrimethacrylate, allyl methacrylate, blends thereof, and combinationsthereof. In some embodiments, the second component may contain from0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from crosslinking monomer selected from thegroup consisting of divinylbenzene; allyl compounds including diallylphthalate, diallylacrylamide, triallyl(iso)cyanurate, and triallyltrimelitate; (poly)alkylene glycol di(meth)acrylate compounds including1,6-hexanediol di(meth)acrylate, (poly)ethylene glycol di(meth)acrylate,(poly)propylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, (poly)tetramethylene glycoldi(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol tetra(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritoltri(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol di(meth)acrylate, trimethylolpropanetri(meth)acrylate, dipentaerythritol hexa(meth)acrylate, anddipentaerythritol penta(meth)acrylate.

Graft-linking agents useful in the gloss reducing additives arepolyethylenically unsaturated monomers copolymerizable with themonounsaturated monomers present in the second component, and having twoor more non-conjugated double bonds of differing reactivity, as forexample allyl methacrylate, diallyl maleate and allylacryloxypropionate. The preferred graft-linking agent is allylmethacrylate.

The gloss reducing additives of the second component comprise a(meth)acrylate copolymer having a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 40° C., measured via DSC, second heat. Allindividual values and subranges from greater than 40° C. are includedherein and disclosed herein; for example, the glass transitiontemperature of the (meth)acrylate copolymer of the second component canbe from a lower limit of 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 70, 80, 90, or 100° C. Forexample, the glass transition temperature may be in the range of fromgreater than 40° C., or in the alternative, the glass transitiontemperature may be in the range of from greater than 55° C. As usedherein throughout “(meth)acrylate” means acrylate and/or methacrylate.

In some embodiments of the invention, the gloss reducing additives ofthe second component may further comprise one or more copolymersselected from styrenic polymers comprising one or more styrenic monomerunits.

In some embodiments of the invention, the gloss reducing additives ofthe second component may further comprise one or more(meth)acrylate/styrenic copolymers comprising an amount derived from oneor more (meth)acrylate monomer units selected from the group of C₁-C₁₈(meth)acrylates and one or more styrenic monomer units.

Exemplary styrenic monomer units useful in the gloss reducing additivesof the second component include styrene, acrylonitrile, blends thereofand combinations thereof.

(Meth)acrylate copolymers useful in the gloss reducing additives of thesecond component include one or more C₁-C₁₈ (meth)acrylate monomerunits, including, by way of example and not limitation, butyl acrylate,ethylacrylate, 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate, propyl acrylate, methyl acrylate,hexyl acrylate, butylmethacrylate, methylmethacrylate, ethylhexylmethacrylate, stearyl acrylate, benzyl acrylate, blends thereof, andcombinations thereof.

A test specimen produced from the inventive thermoplastic compositionhas a roughness measured according to DIN 4768 of Ra greater than orequal to 0.6 microns, Rz greater than or equal to 6 microns and Rmaxgreater than or equal to 7 microns. All individual values and subrangesof Ra greater than 0.6 microns are included herein and disclosed herein;for example, the Ra can be from a lower limit of 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, or1.0 microns. All individual values and subranges of Rz greater than 6microns are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, the Rzcan be from a lower limit of 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 microns. All individualvalues and subranges of Rmax greater than 7 microns are included hereinand disclosed herein; for example, the Rmax can be from a lower limit of7, 8, 9, 10, or 11 microns.

Another embodiment of the thermoplastic composition of the inventioncomprises the melt blending product of a first component comprising oneor more thermoplastic polymers; and from 2 to 20 PHR of a secondcomponent comprising one or more gloss reducing additive copolymerswherein each gloss reducing additive copolymer comprises a(meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more (meth)acrylatemonomers and from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM of units derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents, polymerized to give acopolymer that has a glass transition temperature of greater than orequal to 40° C.; wherein a test specimen produced from the thermoplasticcomposition has a 75 degree gloss less than 65.

Another embodiment of the invention provides a thermoplastic compositioncomprising the melt blending product of a first component comprising oneor more thermoplastic polymers; and a second component comprising one ormore core/shell polymers wherein said one or more core/shell polymerscomprise a crosslinked core comprising units derived from one or more(meth)acrylate monomers and from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one ormore crosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents, polymerized togive a copolymer having a glass transition temperature of greater thanor equal to 10° C., and one or more thermoplastic shells having a Tg ofequal to or greater than 60° C. wherein the shell optionally comprisesfrom 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from of one or more crosslinking monomersand/or graft-linking agents. The weight percentage of the core may befrom 50 to 95 wt % and the one or more shells may be from 5 to 50 wt %,based on the total weight of the one or more core/shell polymers. Allindividual values and subranges of the amount of the core in the one ormore core/shell polymers are included herein and disclosed herein; forexample, the core may be from a lower limit of 50, 60, 70, 80, or 90 wt% of the total weight of the one or more core/shell polymers; and froman upper limit of 55, 65, 75, 85, or 95 wt % of the total weight of theone or more core/shell polymers. The amount of core in the one or morecore/shell polymers may range from 50 to 95 wt %; or in the alternativefrom 55 to 75 wt %; or in the alternative, from 65 to 35 wt %; or in thealternative, from 50 to 65 wt %, based on the total weight of the one ormore core/shell polymers. All individual values and subranges of theamount of one or more shells in the one or more core/shell polymers areincluded herein and disclosed herein; for example, the one or moreshells may be from a lower limit of 5, 15, 25, 35, or 45 wt % of thetotal weight of the one or more core/shell polymers; and from an upperlimit of 15, 25, 35, 45, or 50 wt % of the total weight of the one ormore core/shell polymers. The amount of the one or more shells in theone or more core/shell polymers may range from 5 to 50 wt %; or in thealternative from 25 to 45 wt %; or in the alternative, from 15 to 35 wt%; or in the alternative, from 35 to 50 wt %, based on the total weightof the one or more core/shell polymers.

The thermoplastic composition comprises of first component comprisingone or more thermoplastic polymers, as described hereinabove.

The thermoplastic composition comprises from 2 to 20 PHR of a secondcomponent comprising one or more core/shell polymers. All individualvalues from 2 to 20 PHR are included herein and disclosed herein; forexample, the second component may be present in an amount from a lowerlimit of 2, 8, 12, 15, or 17 PHR, to an upper limit of 3, 5, 8, 10, 13,15, 17 or 20 PHR.

In some embodiments, the core/shell polymers have a volume averageparticle size in the range of from 70 to 350 nm. All individual valuesand subranges from 70 to 350 nm are included herein and disclosedherein; for example, the average polymer particle size can be from alower limit of 70, 100, 150, 200, 250 or 300 nm to an upper limit of100, 200, 250, 300, or 350 nm. For example, the average polymer particlesize may be in the range of from 70 to 350 nm, or in the alternative,from 70 to 250 nm, or in the alternative, from 70 to 150 nm, or in thealternative, from 70 to 100 nm, or in the alternative, from 100 to 350nm, or in the alternative, from 150 to 350 nm, or in the alternative,from 100 to 250 nm, or in the alternative, from 300 to 350 nm.

The one or more core/shell polymers comprise a crosslinked core and anoptionally crosslinked thermoplastic shell. The core/shell polymers maybe produced via emulsion polymerization process, which produces acrosslinked core and an optionally crosslinked thermoplastic shell.

The core comprises a crosslinked core comprising units derived from oneor more (meth)acrylate monomers and from 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived fromone or more crosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents,polymerized to give a (meth)acrylate copolymer that has a glasstransition temperature of equal to or greater than 10° C. The(meth)acrylate copolymer useful in the core is as described hereinabovein connection with the gloss reducing additive.

The core/shell particles comprise one or more thermoplastic shellshaving a glass transition temperature of greater than or equal to 60° C.All ranges and subranges of greater than or equal to 60° C. are includedherein and disclosed herein; for example, the Tg of the thermoplasticshells can be equal to or greater than 65° C.; in the alternative, equalto or greater than 70° C.; in the alternative, equal to or greater than75° C.; in the alternative, equal to or greater than 80° C.; or in thealternative, equal to or greater than 85° C.

In some embodiments, the one or more thermoplastic shells are comprisedpredominantly of MMA monomer units. As used herein throughout the term“predominantly” means greater than 55 and less than 100 percent byweight, based on the total weight of the thermoplastic shell. Allindividual ranges and subranges between greater than 55 and less than100 percent by weight are included herein and disclosed herein; forexample, the one or more thermoplastic shells may have an optionallycrosslinked MMA content by weight of greater than a lower limit of 55,70, 80, or 90 percent and an upper limit of 99, 90, 85, or 75 percent.For example the thermoplastic shells may comprise units derived from MMAin the range of 55 to 99; or in the alternative, from 70 to 85; or inthe alternative, from 80 to less than 100 percent by weight, based onthe total weight of the thermoplastic shell.

The one or more thermoplastic shells may further comprise one or more(meth)acrylate copolymers, one or more (meth)acrylate/styreniccopolymers, one or more styrenic copolymers, or combinations thereof,all of which may include those options as described in connection withthe gloss reducing additives.

In certain embodiments of the inventive thermoplastic shell composition,the (meth)acrylate copolymer of the one or more thermoplastic shellscomprises between 50 and 95 percent by weight methylmethacrylate unitsand between 5 and 50 percent by weight units of ethylacrylate and/orbutylacrylate. As used herein the term “ethylacrylate and/orbutylacrylate” means solely ethylacrylate, solely butylacrylate or acombination of ethylacrylate and butylacrylate present.

In yet other embodiments of the inventive thermoplastic composition, the(meth)acrylate copolymer of the one or more thermoplastic shellscomprises from 68 to 72 wt % derived from methylmethacrylate units andfrom 28 to 32 wt % derived from ethylacrylate units.

In some embodiments, the one or more shells may further comprise from0.001 to 0.014 PHM derived from one or more crosslinking monomers and/orgraft-linking agents. All ranges and subranges from 0.001 to 0.04 PHMare included herein and disclosed herein; for example, units derivedfrom one or more crosslinking monomer and/or graft-linking agents may bepresent from an upper limit of 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, or 0.008 PHM to alower limit of 0.001, 0.003, 0.005, 0.006 or 0.009 PHM. For example,units derived from one or more crosslinking monomers and/orgraft-linking agents in the one or more shells may be in the range offrom 0.001 to 0.04 PHM, or in the alternative, from 0.003 to 0.03 PHM,or in the alternative, from 0.005 to 0.02 PHM.

Another embodiment of the invention provides a method for producing athermoplastic composition comprising: selecting a first componentcomprising one or more thermoplastic polymers; selecting a secondcomponent comprising one or more gloss reducing additive copolymerswherein each gloss reducing additive copolymer comprises a(meth)acrylate copolymer derived from one or more (meth)acrylatemonomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or more crosslinkingmonomers and/or graft-linking agents; wherein each gloss reducingadditive copolymer has a glass transition temperature of greater than orequal to 40° C.; melt processing the second component into the firstcomponent wherein the second component is present in an amount of from 2to 20 PHR; thereby producing the thermoplastic composition wherein atest specimen produced therefrom has roughness according to DIN 4768 inthe range Ra greater than or equal to 0.6 microns, Rz greater than orequal to 6 microns and Rmax greater than or equal to 7 microns.

In another embodiment of the invention, the method for producing athermoplastic composition comprises the steps of: selecting a firstcomponent comprising one or more thermoplastic polymers; selecting asecond component comprising one or more polymers which comprise acrosslinked core comprising units derived from one or more(meth)acrylate monomers and 0.001 to 0.04 PHM derived from one or morecrosslinking monomers and/or graft-linking agents, polymerized to give a(meth)acrylate copolymer that has a glass transition temperature ofgreater than or equal to 10° C., and one or more thermoplastic shellshaving a glass transition temperature of greater than or equal to 60°C.; and melt kneading the second component into the first component.

In some embodiments of the invention, an article produced from thethermoplastic composition has a gloss measured according to ASTM D523that is substantially independent of a shear rate during the meltkneading. As used herein, the term “substantially independent of a shearrate” means that the gloss does not change by more than 10 units ofgloss, at a 75 degree angle, over a 5 fold increase in extruder rpm. Insome embodiments, the inventive thermoplastic compositions exhibit agloss measured according to ASTM D523 which is not increased by morethan 10% following thermoforming of an article from the thermoplasticcomposition.

The invention further provides an article comprising any one or more ofthe inventive thermoplastic compositions. The thermoplastic compositionsdisclosed herein can be used to manufacture durable articles for theautomotive, construction, medical, food and beverage, electrical,appliance, business machine, and consumer markets. In some embodiments,the thermoplastic compositions are used to manufacture flexible durableparts or articles selected from window profiles, house siding, householdappliances automotive interior and exterior trims. Additionally thethermoplastic compositions of the present invention may also be formedinto consumer and sporting-goods.

The thermoplastic compositions can be used to prepare these durableparts or articles with known polymer processes such as extrusion (e.g.,sheet extrusion and profile extrusion); molding (e.g., injectionmolding, rotational molding, and blow molding); and blown film and castfilm processes. In general, extrusion is a process by which a polymer ispropelled continuously along a screw through regions of high temperatureand pressure where it is melted and compacted, and finally forcedthrough a die. The extruder can be a single screw extruder, a multiplescrew extruder, a disk extruder or a ram extruder. The die can be a filmdie, blown film die, sheet die, pipe die, tubing die or profileextrusion die.

Injection molding is also widely used for manufacturing a variety ofplastic parts for various applications. In general, injection molding isa process by which a polymer is melted and injected at high pressureinto a mold, which is the inverse of the desired shape, to form parts ofthe desired shape and size. The mold can be made from metal, such assteel and aluminum.

Molding is generally a process by which a polymer is melted and led intoa mold, which is the inverse of the desired shape, to form parts of thedesired shape and size. Molding can be pressureless orpressure-assisted.

Rotational molding is a process generally used for producing hollowplastic products. By using additional post-molding operations, complexcomponents can be produced as effectively as other molding and extrusiontechniques. Rotational molding differs from other processing methods inthat the heating, melting, shaping, and cooling stages all occur afterthe polymer is placed in the mold, therefore no external pressure isapplied during forming.

Blow molding can be used for making hollow plastics containers. Theprocess includes placing a softened polymer in the center of a mold,inflating the polymer against the mold walls with a blow pin, andsolidifying the product by cooling. There are three general types ofblow molding: extrusion blow molding, injection blow molding, andstretch blow molding. Injection blow molding can be used to processpolymers that cannot be extruded. Stretch blow molding can be used fordifficult to blow crystalline and crystallizable polymers such aspolypropylene.

Articles produced from the inventive thermoplastic compositions exhibita lower gloss than articles produced from solely the first componentthermoplastic polymers. Specifically, an article formed from theinventive thermoplastic compositions exhibits a gloss of less than orequal to 65 measured at a 75 degree angle according to ASTM D523.

Articles produced from the thermoplastic compositions described hereinexhibit an impact strength which is not substantially less than theimpact strength articles produced from solely the first componentthermoplastic polymers. Specifically, an article formed from theinventive thermoplastic compositions exhibits an impact strengthmeasured according to ASTM D4226 that is at least 90% of the impactstrength of an article formed from the first component thermoplasticpolymer without a second component.

The thermoplastic compositions of the present invention may furtherinclude additional additives including, but are not limited to,antistatic agents, color enhancers, dyes, lubricants, fillers, flameretardants, pigments, primary antioxidants, secondary antioxidants,processing aids, impact modifiers, UV stabilizers, plasticizers, blendsthereof, and combinations thereof. The inventive thermoplasticcompositions may contain any amounts of additives. The inventivethermoplastic compositions may compromise from greater than 0 to lessthan 60 weight percent of the combined weight of such additives, basedon the weight of the inventive thermoplastic composition including suchadditives. All individual values and subranges from about 0 to about 60wt percent are included herein and disclosed herein; for example, theinventive thermoplastic compositions may compromise from 0 to 60 wt % ofthe combined weight of additives; or in the alternative, from 0 to 50 wt%; or in the alternative, from 0 to 30 wt %; or in the alternative, from0 to 20 wt %; or in the alternative, from 0 to 10 wt %; or in thealternative, from 0 to 5 wt %.

As used herein, the term PHR means parts per hundred resin by weight.For example, 10 PHR additive means 10 parts by weight of additive per100 parts by weight resin. More specifically, for example, 10 PHRadditive may mean 10 pounds of additive per 100 pounds of resin. As usedherein, the term PHM means parts per hundred monomer. For example, 0.04PHM crosslinking monomer in a core/shell polymer comprising(meth)acrylate monomer units means that the core/shell polymer has 0.04parts per 100 parts of the (meth)acrylate monomers.

EXAMPLES

Table 1 lists the source and composition of the components used inpreparing the Inventive and Comparative Examples.

TABLE 1 Component Composition Source DOWFAX ™ 2A1 AlkyldiphenyloxideDisulfonate Dow Chemical Company Anionic Surfactant PARALOID ™ Impactmodified PMMA/acrylate Dow Chemical Company LFR-2006 copolymer.PLEXIGLAS ™ VS- PMMA copolymer Altuglas International 100 division ofArkema LURAN ™ 358N Styrene acrylonitrile copolymer BASF Corp. SANTELURLAN ™ GP- Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene BASF Corp. 22 copolymer.ABS PARALOID ™ 5 micron particle size, crosslinked Dow Chemical CompanyEXL-5136 acrylic copolymer particles. PARALOID ™ KF- 10 to 30 micronparticle size, Dow Chemical Company 710 crosslinked styrene/acrylatecopolymer particles. OxyVinyls ™ 222 Polyvinyl Chloride Powder (PVC)OxyVinyls LP, Dallas Tx ADVASTAB ™ TM- Tin stabilizer for PVC DowChemical Company 181 ADVALUBE ™ B- Lubricant for PVC Dow ChemicalCompany 3314 OMYACARB ™ Calcium carbonate filler Omya Inc. UFT TI-PURE ™R-960 Titanium dioxide The du Pont Chemical Co PARALOID ™ K- Acrylicprocessing aid for PVC Dow Chemical Company 120N PARALOID ™ K- Acrylicprocessing aid for PVC Dow Chemical Company 175

Inventive Examples 1-4 and Comparative Example 1 Crosslinker LevelEffect on Gloss Reducing Properties

The second components added to each of Inventive Examples 1-4 wereprepared according to the following procedure, which is a two shotemulsion polymerization method. The compositions of the secondcomponents added to each of Inventive Examples 1-4 varied by amount ofEGDMA and had an overall composition of 84 PHR MMA/4 PHR BMA/12 PHRBA/variable amounts (PHM) of EGDMA.

1400 grams deionized water and 0.10 grams sodium hydroxide were chargedto a round bottom five liter glass reactor. The contents of the glassreactor were stirred at 100 rpm and heated to 40° C. while sparging withdry nitrogen gas for 30 minutes. 10 grams (49.74% solids) of a Dowfax2A1 surfactant, 0.14 grams of a EDTA, disodium salt, and 0.05 grams ofiron sulfate heptahydrate were added to the glass reactor. Thetemperature was maintained at 40 (±2)° C. A monomer emulsion mixtureconsisting of: (1) 566 grams methyl methacrylate, 27 grams butylmethacrylate, 81 grams of butyl acrylate, and a variable amount ofethylene glycol dimethacrylate (“EGDMA”) in 500 grams of water; (2) asolution of 1 gm of sodium persulfate in 20 gms water, and (3) and asolution of 0.11 grams of sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate in 10 grams ofwater was then added to the glass reactor. The temperature of the glassreactor was maintained at 40 (±2)° C. The second components used in eachof Inventive Examples 1, 2, 3, and 4 were produced using 0.14, 0.034,0.07, and 0.14 PHM of EDGMA, respectively. The second component used inComparative Example 1 was produced as above using no EGDMA.

The resulting latex in the glass reactor was cooled to 40° C. and 43grams (49.74% solids) of a DOWFAX 2A1 surfactant was added to the latex.A mixture of: (1) 816 grams methyl methacrylate, 39 grams butylmethacrylate, 116 grams of butyl acrylate, and a variable amount ofEGDMA and; (2) a solution of 0.44 grams of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, anda solution of 0.36 grams of sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate in 10 gramsof water were then added to the reactor. Heat was generated with thisaddition and the peak temperature of the latex mixture was held forabout 10 minutes. During the peak temperature hold period, a solutioncontaining 5.5 grams of Dowfax 2A1 and 15 grams of a 5% sodiumpersulfate was added. Following such addition, the temperature of themixture was held at the peak temperature for 15 minutes, and then cooledto 40° C. The latex mixture was then discharged from the glass reactorthrough a cheesecloth filter. The second component was isolated bydrying in a vacuum oven at 50° C. for 40 hrs or until the moisturecontent was less than 0.5 wt %. The second components used in InventiveExamples 1, 2, 3, and 4 were prepared by adding 0.0025, 0.005, 0.01, and0.020 PHM of EDGMA, respectively, in this step of the process

The second component samples were extruded in a PVC formulation using aHaake, conical, twin screw extruder. Zone 1 was set at 165 C; zone 2 setat 175 C; zone 3 set at 175 C. The RPMS were set at 40, and a 2 inch diewith a die gap of 30 mils was used. The die was set at 175 C. The PVCformulation is shown in Table 2 and is referred to herein as the PVCmasterbatch.

TABLE 2 Material PHR OXYVINYLS ™ 222 100 ADVASTAB ™ TM-181 1.2ADVALUBE ™ B-3314 2.7 OMYACARB ™ UFT 3 TI-PURE ™ R-960 9 PARALOID ™K-120N 1 PARALOID ™ K-175 0.5 Total 117.4

This masterbatch formulation was blended in a high speed mixer and thesecond components were post added to the master batch at 5 PHR based onPVC resin (i.e., OxyVinyls™ 222)(50 grams of second component and 1174grams of PVC master batch). Table 3 provides the results of glosstesting according to ASTM D523 of each of Inventive Examples (Inv. Ex.)1-4 and Comparative Example (Com. Ex.) 1.

TABLE 3 PHM EGDMA in the Gloss, 60 Example second component degree angleComp. Ex. 1 — 70.4 Inv. Ex. 1 0.0025 42.0 Inv. Ex. 2 0.005 30.1 Inv. Ex.3 0.01 31.5 Inv. Ex. 4 0.02 60.5

As can be seen in Table 3, the surface gloss of the inventivethermoplastic blends goes through a minimum as the amount of EGDMA crosslinker is increased. Thus, an optimal level of EGDMA is between 0.005and 0.01 PHM EGDMA for this thermoplastic blend composition and process.Higher levels of EGDMA nevertheless showed lower gloss than ComparativeExample 1 with no second component.

Inventive Examples 5-9 and Comparative Examples 2-3

Gloss testing on Inventive Examples 5-10 and Comparative Example 2 wereconducted by blending the second components, as discussed below, to animpact modified acrylic resin, PARALOID™ LFR-2006, which is an impactmodified PMMA/acrylate copolymer.

10 PHR of each second component was mixed with 100 parts of PARALOID™LFR-2006 powder by bag mixing. The resulting blend was then extrudedusing a Haake, conical, twin screw extruder with the followingconditions: zone 1 was at 165° C.; zone 2 was at 185° C.; zone 3 was at185° C.; the screw operated at 100 rpm; using a 2 inch die with a gap of35 mils; and a die temperature of 185° C. The composition of the secondcomponent was 70 wt % MMA/30 wt % EA/variable parts (PHM) EGDMA, asspecified below.

The second components used in Inventive Examples 5-9 and ComparativeExample 2 were prepared according to the general procedure described inComparative Example 1, except that the levels of crosslinkers werevaried as listed in Table 4.

Table 4 provides the gloss and other properties of Inventive Examples5-9 and Comparative Examples 2-3.

TABLE 4 Solution Solution PHM Gloss, 75 Viscosity % Transmittance DartImpact Example EGDMA degree angle 5% in DPM 600 nm/1 cm cell In-lb/40mil Comparative 0 118 — — 39 Example 3 Comparative 0 78 5040 100 52Example 2 Inventive 0.012 29 600 29.3 45 Example 5 Inventive 0.05 95 363.9 39 Example 6 Inventive 0.1 102 28 6.9 40 Example 7 Inventive 0.2 10712 1.4 42 Example 8 Inventive 0.4 110 12 0.7 42 Example 9

As can be seen in Table 4, at levels above 0.05 PHM EGDMA glossincreased almost to the level of Comparative Example 3 which containedno second component. Solution viscosity decreased as the crosslinkerlevel, i.e. EGDMA level, is increased as the polymer becomes lesssoluble and therefore, does not expand as much in the solvent. Theopaqueness of the solution also increased as the crosslinker levelincreases, once again demonstrating that the polymer is becoming lesssoluble as crosslinker level is increased. The impact resistance was notcompromised by the second component, as evidenced by the impact testingresults shown in Table 4.

Inventive Examples 10-11 Effect of Gloss Reducing Additive Level inThermoplastic Blend

A second component (70 wt % MMA/30 wt % EA/0.01 PHM EGDMA), as describedbelow, was added at 5 PHR and 10 PHR based on the resin Parloid™LFR-2006 to form Inventive Examples 10 and 11, respectively.

The second component of Inventive Examples 10 and 11 was preparedaccording to the general procedure outlined in Example 1. Thecomposition of the polymer thus prepared is (70 wt % MMA/30 wt % EA/0.01PHM EGDMA).

The data shown in Table 5 below illustrates that the gloss reduction isproportional to the level of second component in the formulation andthat the level of second component does not negatively affect impactresistance.

TABLE 5 PHR of second Gloss, Dart impact Example Component 75 degreeangle In-lb/40 mils Comparative Example 3 0 120 42 Inventive Example 105 57 46 Inventive Example 11 10 30 48

Inventive Example 12 and Comparative Examples 1, 4, and 5 Effect of HighCrosslinking and Light Crosslinking on Impact Resistance

PARALOID™ EXL-5136 which is a 5 micron highly crosslinked particle andPARALOID™ KF-710 which is a 10 to 30 micron highly crosslinked particlewere used to prepare Comparative Examples 4 and 5, respectively.Comparative Example 1 is the base PVC formulation shown in Table 2 withno gloss reducing additive.

The gloss reducing additive used in Inventive Example 12 was madeaccording to the following procedure:

1400 grams deionized water and 0.10 grams sodium hydroxide were chargedto a round bottom five liter glass reactor. The mixture was stirred at100 rpm and heated to 40° C. while sparging with nitrogen for 30minutes. 10 grams (49.74% solids) of a Dowfax 2A1 surfactant and 0.14grams of a EDTA, disodium salt and 0.05 grams of iron sulfateheptahydrate were added to the reactor. The temperature was brought to40 (±2)° C. A mixture of (1) 472 grams methyl methacrylate and 202 gramsethylacrylate, and 0.1 gram of ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (2) asolution of 1 gm of sodium persulfate in 20 grams water, (3) and asolution of 0.11 grams of sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate in 10 grams ofwater were added to the reactor. After an exotherm was observed, it wasallowed to reach peak temperature, following which the reactor was heldat the peak temperature for about 10 minutes and then cooled to 40° C.

Subsequently, 43 grams (49.74% solids) of a Dowfax 2A1 surfactant and amixture of (1) 680 grams methyl methacrylate and 291 grams ethylacrylate0.145 grams of ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, (2) a solution of 0.44grams of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, and a 0.36 grams of sodiumformaldehyde sulfoxylate in 10 grams of water were then added to thereactor. An exotherm was observed and allowed to reach peak temperatureand held at the peak temperature for about 10 minutes. During the holdperiod, 5.5 grams of Dowfax 2A1 and 15 grams of a 5% sodium persulfatesolution were added to the reactor. Subsequently the resulting latex wasthen cooled to 40° C. The reactor contents were then discharged throughcheesecloth. The second component was isolated by drying in a vacuumoven at 50° C. for 40 hrs or until the moisture content was less than0.5%. The second component prepared as described hereinabove was addedsolely to Inventive Example 12 and not to any of Comparative Examples 1,4, and 5.

Table 6 illustrates both gloss reduction and impact resistance effectsof Inventive Example 12 and Comparative Examples 5-7 in PVC as thematrix polymer. PVC was extruded in the same way as Inventive Examples1-4.

TABLE 6 PHR Gloss, 60 Gloss, 85 Dart Impact Second Gloss, 20 degreedegree In-lb/40 Example Component degree angle angle angle milsComparative 0 21 72 82 140 Example 1 Masterbatch from Table 2 InventiveExample 12 5 2.7 19 63 160 Comparative 5 2.1 12 15 60 Brittle Example 5Failure Comparative 5 5.4 33 44 124 Brittle Example 4 Failure

Table 6 illustrates that while gloss can be lowered using large, highlycrosslinked polymeric particles, the use of such materials reduced thedart impact resistance of the thermoplastic blend and resulted inbrittle failure. In contrast, the lightly crosslinked second componentutilized in Inventive Example 12 both lowered gloss and maintainedimpact resistance.

Inventive Examples 13-18 and Comparative Example 3 Differing CrosslinkerMonomers

These examples utilize crosslinking monomers other than EGDMA but at aconcentration which provides an equal number of moles of double bonds asprovided by 0.012 PHM EGDMA (i.e., molar equivalents).

Each of Inventive Examples 13-18 were formed as 10 PHR of secondcomponent per 100 parts of PARALOID™ LFR-2006. All of Inventive Examples13-18 have a composition of 70 wt % MMA/30 wt % EA/variable amounts ofcrosslinking monomer (as specified in Table 7) and were made accordingto the general procedure described in inventive Example 1. ComparativeExample 3 is the PARALOID™ LFR-2006 with no second component.

TABLE 7 % Gloss, 75 Solution Transparency Example degree angle Viscosity(cps) 600 nm Comparative Example 3 109 — — Inventive Example 13 31 60045.3 (0.012 EGDMA) Inventive Example 14 36 1200 64 (0.014 BGDMA)Inventive Example 15 42 520 37 (0.008 DVB) Inventive Example 16 60 668096 (0.0076 ALMA) Inventive Example 17 39 440 24 (0.014 TMPTA) InventiveExample 18 32 520 23 (0.012 BGDA) BGDMA = butylene glycoldimethacrylate, DVB = divinyl benzene, ALMA = Allyl methacrylate, TMPTA= trimethylolpropane triacrylate, BGDA = butylenes glycol diacrylate.

As can be seen from the information in Table 7, a wide variety ofcrosslinkers may be used in forming the second components used inInventive Examples 13-18 while still achieving gloss reduction.

Inventive Example 19

The effect of extruder RPM (revolutions per minute) on gloss wasexamined. Inventive Example 19 was prepared as described above inconnection with Inventive Example 12 except that the final formulationof the second component used in Inventive Example 19 has a finalcomposition ratio of 70 wt % MMA/30 wt % EA/0.012 PHM EGDMA. InventiveExample 19 was prepared by mixing 10 PHR of the second component with100 parts PARALOID™ LFR-2006. Extrusion was conducted using the sameprocedure as for Inventive Examples 2-9 with the exception that the RPMsof the extruder were varied from 20 to 100 to examine the effect ofextruder speed on gloss reduction. Comparative Example 3 is PARALOID™LFR-2006 with no second component. The results are shown in Table 8.

TABLE 8 Output rate Gloss, 75 degree angle Extruder Puller Gloss, 75degree angle Comparative RPM Setting Inventive Example 19 Example 3 2012 32.4 108.5 50 20 31.2 105.7 100 39 28.4 105.5

Table 8 illustrates that the extruder RPMs do not appear to have anyappreciable impact on the gloss reduction achieved with the inventivethermoplastic composition. Because the gloss is not dependent onextruder RPMs (shear and throughput rate), the gloss reduction is notlikely to be caused by conventional melt fracture. In a melt fracturemechanism for gloss reduction, increasing extrusion rate increases theamount of melt fracture and gloss should decrease with increasing shearrate.

Inventive Example 20 and Comparative Example 3

The effect of extruder melt temperature on gloss was examined InventiveExample 20 was prepared as described above in connection with InventiveExample 1 except that the final formulation of the second component usedin Inventive Example 20 has a final composition ratio of 70 wt % MMA/30wt % EA/0.014 PHM BGDMA. Inventive Example 20 was prepared by mixingPARALOID™ LFR-2006, with a ratio of 10 PHR second component. InventiveExample 20 and Comparative Example 3 were extruded the same as wereInventive Examples 2-9 except that the zones were adjusted to give themelt temperatures shown in Table 9.

TABLE 9 Melt Temperature Gloss, 75 Degree angle Gloss, 75 Degree angle °C. Inventive Example 20 Comparative Example 3 185 37.5 102.1 199 32.7 —219 29.9 — 229 31.5 114

In a melt fracture mechanism of gloss reduction, gloss would be expectedto increase with increasing temperature as melt fracture is reduced withincreasing temperature. In contrast to a melt fracture gloss reductionmechanism, increasing melt temperature shows essentially no effect onthe gloss reduction achieved with Inventive Example 20.

Inventive Examples 21-23 and Comparative Examples 6-8

The use of lightly crosslinked gloss reducing additives was examined ina variety of matrix polymers. Table 10 lists the compositions ofInventive Examples 21-23. Comparative Examples 6-8 are matrix polymerswith no second component added. The second component used in each ofInventive Examples 21-23 was prepared using the process described inExample 1, except that the final composition ratio of 70 wt % MMA/30 wt% EA/0.01 PHM EGDMA The second component was added at 10 PHR in eachcase to the different matrix polymers and extruded using the sameprocedure as for Inventive Examples 5-9.

TABLE 10 Second Composition/Source of Component Example First componentFirst Component (PHR) Comparative Plexiglas ® VS- PMMA Copolymer from 0Example 6 100 Arkema Inventive Plexiglas ® VS- 10 Example 21 100Comparative Luran ® 358N Styrene acrylonitrile 0 Example 7 copolymerfrom BASF Inventive Luran ® 358N 10 Example 22 SAN ComparativeTelurlan ® GP- Acrylonitrile butadiene 0 Example 8 22 styrene copolymerfrom ABS BASF Inventive Telurlan ® GP- 10 Example 23 22 ABS

TABLE 11 Gloss, 60 Gloss, 75 Gloss, 20 degree degree Dart Impact Exampledegree angle angle angle In-lb/40 mils Comparative 67 132 140 Toobrittle to Example 6 test Inventive 11 48 88 Too brittle to Example 21test Comparative 58 136 132 Too brittle to Example 7 test Inventive 0.86.6 28.1 Too brittle to Example 22 test Comparative 51.5 95.4 100.8 60.5Example 8 Inventive 1 6.6 27.2 58.2 Example 23

Table 11 includes the gloss and impact resistance for each of InventiveExamples 21-23 and Comparative Examples 6-8. As can be seen, the lightlycrosslinked second components used in the inventive thermoplasticcomposition using a variety of matrix polymers is effective atsignificantly reducing the gloss over that of the matrix polymer withoutthe second component. Moreover, in at least Telurlan GP-22 matrixpolymer, there is no negative affect on impact resistance. As shown inprevious inventive examples, the inventive thermoplastic compositionsbased on PVC and impact modified PMMA copolymers also exhibit reductionin gloss and good impact resistance.

Inventive Example 12 and Comparative Examples 3, 5, and 9

The effect of heating a test specimen, mimicking the effect of thermalforming, was tested by measuring the gloss of an extruded sheet beforeand following heating at 165° C. for 20 minutes in an oven. Extrudedsheets were prepared using Inventive Example 12 (described above);Comparative Example 9 containing LFR-2006 and 10 PHR of PARALOID™EXL-5136; Comparative Example 5 as previously stated, containingLFR-2006 and 5 PHR of PARALOID™ KF-710; and Comparative Example 3containing solely PARALOID™ LFR-2006. The results of this testing isshown in Table 12. In comparison to each of Comparative Examples 9 and5, Inventive Example 12 showed no increase in gloss following heating,and, in fact, exhibited a slight decrease in gloss following heating.

TABLE 12 Initial Gloss, Gloss, 75 degree 75 degree angle, Change inExample angle after heating Gloss Comparative Example 3 112 108 −4Inventive Example 12 30 26 −4 Comparative Example 9 56 91 +35Comparative Example 5 64 88 +24

Comparative Examples 10-16 and Inventive Example 13

The second component used in each of Comparative Examples 10-16 was madeaccording to the following procedure:

A seed latex was first prepared by adding 500 grams deionized water and0.04 grams sodium hydroxide to a round bottom five liter glass reactor.The reactor was stirred at 100 rpm and heated to 40° C. with spargingwith dry nitrogen for 30 minutes. 4 grams (49.74% solids) of Dowfax 2A1,0.05 grams sodium EDTA, and 0.03 grams iron sulfate heptahydrate wereadded to the reactor. The temperature was held at 40(±2)° C. A mixtureof: (1) 117 grams methyl methacrylate, 117 grams isobutyl methacrylateacrylate and 12.3 grams of ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, (2) asolution of 0.4 grams of sodium persulfate in 20 grams water, (3) and asolution of 0.04 grams of sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate in 10 grams ofwater was added to the reactor. After a peak temperature was observed,the peak temperature was held for about 10 minutes. The observedparticle size of this latex was 186 nm.

Comparative Example 10 was prepared by the following procedure:

1100 grams deionized water and 138 grams of the seed (preparationdescribed above, at 36% solids) were charged to a round bottom fiveliter glass reactor. The reactor was stirred at 100 rpm and heated to40° C. with sparging with dry nitrogen for 30 minutes. 4 grams (49.74%solids) of a Dowfax 2A1 surfactant were added to the reactor. Thetemperature was adjusted to between 79-81° C. A mixture of: (1) 384grams methyl methacrylate, 165 grams ethylacrylate and 1.38 grams ofethylene glycol dimethacrylate, (2) a solution of 2 grams of sodiumpersulfate in 60 grams water was added to the reactor over a period of 4hours. The temperature was then held at 80° C. for another 120 minutesafter which the mixture was discharged from the reactor through a 150mesh filter.

Comparative Examples 11 and 12 were made by using 45 and 125 grams ofthe latex seed described above, respectively.

For each of Comparative Examples 10-12, the second component was addedat a level of 10 PHR based on LFR-2006, except for Comparative Example 3which is solely LFR-2006.

Inventive Example 13 was prepared as previously described.

The second component of Comparative Examples 20-23(LTL4671/4672/4673/MLK8528) was prepared by the following procedure:

450 grams deionized water and 136 grams of the latex of InventiveExample 13 as a seed latex were charged to a round bottom five literglass reactor. The reactor was stirred at 100 rpm and heated to 40°(±2)C with sparging with dry nitrogen for 30 minutes. 3 grams (49.74%solids) of a Dowfax 2A1 surfactant, 0.05 grams sodium EDTA, and 0.03grams iron sulfate heptahydrate were added to the reactor. Thetemperature was adjusted to 40(±2)° C. A mixture of: (1) 172 gramsmethyl methacrylate, 74 grams ethylacrylate and 0.03 grams of ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate, (2) a solution of 0.4 gm of sodium persulfate in60 gms water and 0.04 gms of sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate in 10 gmswater was added to the reactor. After a peak temperature is observed,the reactor was held at peak temperature for 10 minutes and then cooledto 40° C. before collecting the sample.

Thus comparative Examples 13-16 were prepared by using 136, 25, 15, and3 grams respectively of the seed latex, preparation described in Example13, the preparation of which is described above.

TABLE 13 5% Particle Gloss, 75 Solution % Dart Impact Size degreeViscosity Transmittance inch-lb/40 Nm angle (cps) 600 nm milsComparative Example 3 119 — — 41 Comparative Example 10 356 110 42 8.637 Comparative Example 11 505 112 30 1.3 38 Comparative Example 12 85575 50 31 30 Inventive Example 13 184 31 600 45.3 49 Comparative Example13 350 82 82 1.2 41 Comparative Example 14 400 90 78 1.2 39 ComparativeExample 15 500 82 50 1.2 28 Comparative Example 16 794 94 32 15 33

For Comparative Examples 10-12, as the particle size increases, thegloss starts to drop, but not as efficiently as in the inventivethermoplastic composition like inventive example 13. These examplescontain 0.25 PHM of EGDMA and are moderately crosslinked.

Comparative Examples 13-16 are made according to the method that theinventive thermoplastic compositions are made, except they are made witha larger particle size. Despite the larger particle size, ComparativeExamples 13-16 do not show a drop in gloss as would be expected from agloss reduction mechanism depending upon large particles sticking out ofthe surface.

TABLE 14 PS Gloss, (particle 75/60 size) Ra Rz Rmax Degree Nm Micronmicron Micron angle Comparative — 0.107 1.7 2.6 119/115 Example 3Inventive Example 13 184 0.806 8.1 10.1   31/7.5 70 wt % MMA/30 wt %EA/0.012 PHM EGDMA Inventive Example 15 200 0.752 7.3 9.0   42/10.7 70wt % MMA/30 wt % EA/0.008 PHM DVB Inventive Example 16 183 0.664 6.4 7.8  60/18.2 70 wt % MMA/30 wt EA/0.0076 PHM ALMA Comparative 855 0.299 3.13.6 75/34 Example 12 69.75 wt % MMA/30 wt % EA/0.25 PHM EGDMA

Each of the examples in Table 14 includes the second component at alevel of 10 PHR per PARALOID™ LFR-2006 and extruded using the sameprocedure as for Inventive Examples 5-9.

Inventive Examples 24-27 and Comparative Example 1 The Effect of PolymerTg on Gloss Reducing Properties

The samples were made according to the procedure outlined in InventiveExample 13. The MMA/EA ratio was varied from 86:14 to 60:40. InventiveExamples 24-27 each contained 5 PHR the second component per 100 partsof the PVC in the masterbatch of Table 2.

To show the effect of polymer Tg on gloss reduction, additives wereadded to the PVC master batch formulation and extruded as described inComparative Ex 1. Inventive Examples 24-27 each contained 5 PHR thesecond component per 100 parts of PVC in the master batch. As shown inTable 15, as Tg was lowered, gloss decreased and leveled off at acalculated Tg around 60° C. Tg was calculated using the Gordon-Taylerequation, as detailed in Penzel, E, Rieger, J, and Schneider, H. A.,“The Glass Transition Temperature of Random Copolymers: 1. ExperimentalData and the Gordon Taylor Equation”, Polymer, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1997, pp.325-337. Specifically: Tg=(Tg_(A)w_(A)+KTg_(B)w_(B))÷(w_(A)+Kw_(B)),where w_(A) and w_(B) are the weight fractions and Tg_(A) and Tg_(B) theglass transition temperatures of the respective homopolymers. Tg_(A) andTg_(B) are assigned such that Tg_(A)<Tg_(B). K is a constant thatdepends on composition and the values are listed in the reference.1

TABLE 15 Gloss, 60 Tg degree Comparative Example 1 72 No AdditiveInventive Example 24 80.5 60 86 wt % MMA/14 wt % EA/0.015 PHM EGDMAInventive Example 25 74.3 34 80 wt % MMA/20 wt % EA/0.015 PHM EGDMAInventive Example 26 60.9 19 70 wt % MMA/30 wt % EA/0.015 PHM EGDMAInventive Example 27 48.6 17 60 wt % MMA/40 wt % EA/0.015 PHM EGDMA

Inventive Examples 28-35 and Comparative Example 3 The Use of Core/ShellParticles Where the Tg of Each Core Differs

For isolation of powders from emulsions by methods such as spray drying,it is advantageous to have a high Tg (greater than 60° C.) shell onparticles so that the powder does not pack into a solid during storage.This is particularly a problem with polymers that have a Tg of less than60° C.

In Inventive Examples 29-35, a core polymer is first made and a shell ofPMMA is placed on the core. Inventive example 28 is just the core withno shell. The shell can be made with or without crosslinking monomer. Inthe following examples, the shell has a Tg of 105° C. The core polymerswere prepared by the general procedure outlined for Inventive Example 13except that different MMA to EA ratios were used to obtain the targetTg. A shell layer of either crosslinked or uncrosslinked MMA is added bythe following procedure:

1300 grams of the latex prepared using the process described inconnection with Inventive Example 1, containing 520 grams of polymer,with a composition of 80 PHR MMA/20PHR EA/0.012 PHM EGDMA, and 3 gramsof Dowfax 2A1 were mixed in a glass reactor. The contents of the glassreactor were stirred at 100 rpm and heated to between 74-76° C. whilesparging with dry nitrogen gas for 30 minutes. A mixture of: (1) 0.14grams of sodium persulfate in 30 grams of water and (2) 90 grams MMA and0.01 grams EGDMA, were fed to the reactor over a period of 60 minuteswhile the temperature was maintained between 74 and 76° C. After thefeeds were complete, the reaction mixture was held at 75° C. for another30 minutes, cooled to 40° C., filtered and freeze dried. The samplesdescribed in the Table 16 were prepared with the same procedure with noEGDMA crosslinker in Inventive Example 33-35. The second component wasadded at a rate of 10 PHR per 100 parts of PARALOID™ LFR-2006 andextruded as in Inventive Examples 5-9.

TABLE 16 Gloss, 75 5% Solution degree Core Viscosity % Transmittanceangle Tg (cps) 600 nm Comparative Example 3 120 — — PARALOID ™ LFR-2006with no additive Inventive Example 28 33 600 45.3 70 wt % MMA/30 wt %EA/0.012 EGDMA Inventive Example 29 29 74.3 112 21   Core 85% (80 wt %MMA/20 wt % EA/0.012 PHM EGDMA) Shell 15% (100 wt % MMA/0.012 PHM EGDMA)Inventive Example 30 25 61.7 158 22.4 Core 85% (70.6 wt % MMA/29.4 wt %EA/0.012 PHM EGDMA) Shell 15% (100 wt % MMA/0.012 PHM EGDMA) InventiveExample 31 26 48.6 216 39.5 Core 85% (60 wt % MMA/40 wt % EA/0.012 PHMEGDMA) Shell 15% (100 wt % MMA/0.012 PHM EGDMA) Inventive Example 32 2336.7 272 51.8 Core 85% (49.4 wt % MMA/50.6 wt % EA/0.012 PHM EGDMA)Shell 15% (100 wt % MMA/0.012 PHM EGDMA) Inventive Example 33 31 48.6 —— Core 85% (60 wt % MMA/40 wt % EA/0.012 PHM EGDMA) Shell 15% (100 wt %MMA with no crosslinker) Inventive Example 34 29 36.7 — — Core 85% (49.4wt % MMA/50.6 wt % EA/0.012 PHM EGDMA) Shell 15% (100 wt % MMA with nocrosslinker) Inventive Example 35 39 12.4 85% (24.7 wt % MMA/75.3 wt %EA/0.012 PHM EGDMA) Shell 15% (100 wt % MMA with no crosslinker)

Test Methods

Polymer Particle Size

Polymer particle size was measured using very dilute aqueousdispersions, i.e., latexes (diluted to 0.001% solids) with a BI 90(Brookhaven Instruments, Holtsville, N.Y.) particle size detector,utilizing Dynamic Light Scattering (15° and 90° scattering angles) and alaser light source. The signal was detected by a photodiode array andthe data analyzed with a built in correlator.

Gloss

Gloss was measured according to ASTM D523. Specifically, gloss wasmeasured on test samples using a Byk-Gardner hand held micro-glossmeter. Gloss was measured using 20, 60, 75, and 85 degree gloss metergeometries. For samples that were unpigmented, a black background wasplaced under the test sample before measuring gloss. Measurements werethe average of three readings.

Solution Viscosity

Polymer samples were dissolved in di(propylene glycol)methyl ether (97%purity from Aldrich Chemical) as a 5% solution by shaking overnight. 4oz. straight walled bottles were used containing 90 grams of totalsolution. The dissolved polymer was placed in a 25° C. water bath for 20minutes and then the viscosity was measured using a Brookfield RVTviscometer. Spindle 5 was used at 100 rpms.

Percent Transmittance

The 5% solutions prepared for solution viscosity measurements wereplaced in 1 cm path length cells for a visible spectrophotometer. Thepercent transmittance was read against a blank of the pure solvent.

Impact

Impact was measured according to ASTM 4226, i.e., dart impact, on 2 inchwide extruded strips of polymer that were about 40 mils in thickness. AGardener drop dart tester was used with a 2 lb weight. The dart had a0.5 inch diameter, round tip. The height in inches needed to cause anybreakage of the strip was recorded. The thickness of the strip wasmeasured with a micrometer. Impact=(height in inches×2 lb×40)÷(stripthickness)=in-lb/40 mils.

Surface Roughness

Samples strips for testing were made by extrusion as describe in therelevant example. Roughly 3 by 5 cm sections were cut and adhered to 5cm by 9 cm aluminum plates with double-sided tape. Additional tape wasapplied around the sides of the sections to keep them as flat aspossible. The samples were sputtercoated with Au/Pd to increasereflectivity. A Wyko NT 1000 Optical Profilometer was used to examinethe surface roughness with the experimental conditions listed in Table17. A magnification of 10× was used, covering an area of roughly 0.25mm² per scan. Five locations for each section were examined. Theinstrument's software calculates the following roughness measurementsaccording to DIN4768: Ra (average height); Rz (ave. of 10 highest−ave.of 10 lowest); and Rmax(max height−min height).

TABLE 17 Optical Profilometry Instrument Wyko NT 1000 Mode VSIMagnification 2.5x, 10x Speed 3x Backscan 30-100 μm Scan length 300-360μm Sputtercoating Au/Pd 80 sec. w/ Ladd Hummer 6.6Opacity

Opacity was determined by visual inspection of the solution with arating scale from 1 to 10. A rating of 1 indicates a perfectly clearsolution and a rating of 10 indicates an opaque solution.

DSC

The glass transition is measured in a TA Instruments Q1000 DifferentialScanning Calorimeter using a small sample of the polymer (5-20 mg)sealed in a small aluminum pan. The pan is placed in the DSC apparatus,and its heat flow response is recorded by scanning at a rate of 10°C./min from room temperature up to 180° C. The glass transitiontemperature is observed as a distinct shift in the heat flow curve.

The present invention may be embodied in other forms without departingfrom the spirit and the essential attributes thereof, and, accordingly,reference should be made to the appended claims, rather than to theforegoing specification, as indicating the scope of the invention.

We claim:
 1. A method for producing a thermoplastic compositioncomprising the steps of: selecting a first component comprising one ormore thermoplastic polymers; selecting a second component comprising oneor more core/shell polymers wherein said one or more core/shell polymerscomprise a crosslinked core comprising one or more gloss reducingpolymeric additives wherein each gloss reducing additive copolymercomprises a (meth)acrylate copolymer having a glass transitiontemperature of greater than or equal to 10° C. and from 0.001 and 0.04PHM derived from one or more crosslinking monomers and/or graft-linkingagents, wherein the one or more (meth)acrylate copolymers comprise from50 to 95 percent by weight units derived from methylmethacrylate unitsand from 5 to 50 percent by weight derived from ethylacrylate and/orbutylacrylate units, and one or more, optionally crosslinked,thermoplastic shells having a Tg of equal to or greater than 60° C.wherein the total amount of the one or more shells comprises 5 to 50 wt% of the total weight of the one or more core/shell polymers; and meltblending the second component into the first component, wherein thesecond component is present in an amount of from 2 to 20 PHR; therebyproducing the thermoplastic composition wherein a test specimen producedfrom the thermoplastic composition exhibits one or more of the followingproperties: (a) a gloss less than 65, 75 degree angle and (b) acombination of a roughness according to DIN 4768 of Ra greater than orequal to 0.6 microns, Rz greater than or equal to 6 microns and Rmaxgreater than or equal to 7 microns.
 2. The method for producing athermoplastic composition according to claim 1, wherein the glossreducing additives of the second component further comprise one or morecopolymers selected from styrenic polymers comprising one or morestyrenic monomer units and (meth)acrylate/styrenic copolymers comprisingone or more (meth)acrylate monomer units and one or more styrenicmonomer units, wherein the styrenic monomer units are selected from thegroup of styrene monomers, acrylonitrile monomers, and combinationsthereof.
 3. The method for producing a thermoplastic compositionaccording to claim 1 wherein the (meth)acrylate monomer units areselected from the group of C₁-C₁₈ (meth)acrylate monomer units.
 4. Themethod for producing a thermoplastic composition according to claim 1,wherein the second component has a polymer particle average volume sizeless than or equal to 350 nm.